Ponad 7000 publikacji medycznych!
Statystyki za 2021 rok:
odsłony: 8 805 378
Artykuły w Czytelni Medycznej o SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19

Poniżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu. Informacja nt. dostępu do pełnej treści artykułu
© Borgis - Nowa Stomatologia 3/2021, s. 55-72 | DOI: 10.25121/NS.2021.26.3.55
*Anna Pantelewicz, Dorota Olczak-Kowalczyk
Detection of dental and psychological symptoms of child abuse and neglect in dental office – systematic review
Wykrywanie stomatologicznych i psychologicznych objawów krzywdzenia i zaniedbywania dzieci w gabinecie stomatologicznym ? przegląd systematyczny
Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw
Head of Department: Professor Dorota Olczak-Kowalczyk, MD, PhD
Streszczenie
Wstęp. Przemoc domowa i jej objawy są zjawiskiem bardzo złożonym. Dzieci narażone na przemoc zgłaszające się do stomatologa prezentują objawy kliniczne i psychologiczne, które mogą pomóc w wykryciu występowania przemocy i zaniedbania.
Cel pracy. Przeszukanie literatury w poszukiwaniu oryginalnych prac badających fizyczne i psychologiczne objawy przemocy domowej oraz opisujących metody wykrywania przemocy domowej w gabinecie stomatologicznym.
Materiał i metody. Systematyczny przegląd literatury angielsko-, hiszpańsko- i polskojęzycznej, prac oryginalnych z udziałem dzieci i młodzieży opublikowanych po 2000 roku. Przeprowadzono wyszukiwanie ręczne w bazach danych: Pubmed/Medline, EBSCO, Wiley Online Library, EMBASE i biblioteki Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego. Wyszukiwanie przeprowadzono z zastosowaniem następujących słów kluczowych: „syndrom znęcania się nad dziećmi”, „przemoc domowa”, „dentysta”, „przemoc”, „dziecko”, „zdrowie jamy ustnej”. Proces weryfikacji został przeprowadzony zgodnie z zasadami analizy PRISMA.
Wyniki. Z 2721 artykułów 52 badań poddano pełnej analizie, z czego do przeglądu zakwalifikowano 5 prac reprezentujących 1108 dzieci. Analiza dotyczyła pełnych tekstów wybranych badań. Na podstawie przeglądu opisano następujące narzędzia przesiewowe: brak podjęcia lub opóźnienie w podjęciu leczenia stomatologicznego, nieprzestrzeganie planu leczenia, zaniedbania w zakresie podstawowej higieny jamy ustnej i ogólnej, obecność zaawansowanej choroby próchnicowej ze współistniejącymi dolegliwościami bólowymi i/lub zmianami zapalnymi, konieczność przeprowadzenia zabiegu w znieczuleniu ogólnym lub sedacji, konieczność wykonania mnogich ekstrakcji i antybiotykoterapii, problemy z zachowaniem.
Wnioski. W większości badań dotyczących wykrywania przemocy domowej i zaniedbywania dzieci badano rozłącznie urazy w obrębie głowy i szyi, zaawansowaną chorobę próchnicową i zaniedbania higieniczne, obecność ubytków niepróchnicowego pochodzenia i zmian śluzówkowych zamiast oceniać je łącznie. Żadne z badań nie uwzględniało czynnika psychologicznego. Istnieje potrzeba opracowania i wdrożenia narzędzi przesiewowych uwzględniających wszystkie wymienione czynniki.
Summary
Introduction. Manifestation of child abuse symptoms is a very complex phenomenon. Children exposed to domestic violence reported to a dentist present several symptoms that can help in detection of child abuse.
Aim.To search the literature for original papers investigating the physical and psychological symptoms of domestic violence and describing the methods of detecting domestic violence in the dental office.
Material and methods. The systematic review, of the articles published after 2000, was performed in the following databases: PubMed, EBSCO, Wiley Online Library, EMBASE, Warsaw Medical University Library. The research was supplemented by hand searching by one professional. Key words that were used in search strategy were: “child abuse syndrome”, “domestic violence”, “dentist”, “violence”, “child”, “oral health”.
Results. Of 2721 potential studies screened, 52 studies were reviewed, and 5 original papers included (representing 1108 children). Screening tools for child abuse and neglects were described by the use of children’s and their family characteristics: failure or delay in seeking dental treatment; failure to follow treatment plan; failure to provide basic oral health; oral and general hygiene negligence, presence of severe caries, presence of untreated dental caries and injures with co-existing pain and swelling, the need of perform treatment or multiple extractions under the sedation or general anesthetizes, behavioural management problems.
Conclusions. Most studies on the detection of child abuse and neglect have examine either oral and head and neck injuries or severe caries and hygiene negligence or occurrence of tooth wear and mucous lesions and injures rather than assessing them together. None of the studies took into to account a psychological factor. There is a need of developing and implementing screening tools integrating all above mentioned factors.



Introduction
Manifestation of child abuse symptoms is a very complex phenomenon. Concerning a several aspects of the child live as physical health, behavioural impairment, neglect, school and friends’ relationships. We distinguish between four types of violence – physical violence, sexual abuse, emotional violence and neglect (1). A dysfunctional family does not meet the emotional needs of its members, does not provide security or proper conditions for proper development and growth (2, 3). A child experiencing domestic violence rarely seeks help in an open manner, do not directly communicate the problem. So that the responsibility for identifying and responding to a problem lays on adults. Children exposed to domestic violence reported to a dentist present several symptoms that can help in detection of child abuse (4). In diagnosing some of the child’s somatic disorders, doctors often ignore the fact that many of the symptoms can be the result of violence against the child. To help them, the physician must be very attentive to any symptoms and effects of domestic violence. In dentistry the most common observation is dental neglect. Dental neglect is defined as the persistent failure to meet a child’s basic oral health needs, likely to result in the serious impairment of a child’s oral health or development (5). Child neglect act is manifested in several ways: lack of caregivers’ interest in the acquisition of information related to dental care, lack of preventive care that shall be performed at home by caregivers (e.g. oral hygiene), dental appointment no-shows, severe untreated caries. Although the head and neck region and oral cavity is a frequent site of abuse in children, visible injuries are rarely observed in dentist everyday practice (6). Becker et al. reported that most frequent intraoral injury in cases of child abuse were in 43% contusions and ecchymosis, 28.5% were abrasions and lacerations of oral mucosa and 28.5% were dental trauma (7). Others report that, physical abuse can cause hematoma on lips may, lacerations, scars of previous trauma, burns caused by hot food or cigarettes, ecchymosis, excoriations. Gagging the mouth may result in bruises, lichenification, or scarring at the corners of the mouth (8, 9). In dental office, from the psychological point of view, children by contact with stressful situation may expose a specific behaviour which can help professionals in detecting child abuse. What’s more oral diseases may be direct expression of emotions or conflicts, while in other instances lesions of the mouth may be an indirect result of emotional problem (10). It has been proven that psychological disorders in people who are victims or witnesses of violence (long-term stress, depression) have their physical manifestations (11). Doctors must therefore be sensitive to more subtle effects of experiencing domestic violence – dental neglect, emotional and psychological effects and psychosomatic symptoms (changes in the mucous membranes, clenching, bruxism) (12-16). Physicians must be aware of the histories, behaviors and physical findings of maltreated children.
Aim
The aim of this review was to search the literature for original papers investigating the physical and psychological symptoms of domestic violence and describing the methods of detecting domestic violence in the dental office.
Material and methods
The systematic literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses PRISMA checklist (17). A review was performed in the following databases: PubMed, EBSCO, Wiley Online Library, EMBASE, Warsaw Medical University Library. The research was supplemented by hand searching by one professional. Key words that were used in search strategy were: “child abuse syndrome”, “domestic violence”, “dentist”, “violence”, “child”, “oral health”. The search strategy is shown in the table 1.
Tab. 1. Search strategy
Baza danych
Database
Strategia wyszukiwana – słowa kluczowe
Search strategy
Wyniki
Results
PubMed “dentistry” AND “domestic violence” AND “child” AND “oral health” 65
 “child abuse” AND “child neglect” AND “dentistry” AND “oral health”88
EMBASE/Medline “dentistry” AND “domestic violence” AND “child” AND “oral health” 113
“child abuse” AND “child neglect” AND “dentistry” AND “oral health”44
EBSCO “dentistry” AND “domestic violence” AND “child” AND “oral health”17
“child abuse” AND “child neglect” AND “dentistry” AND “oral health”38
Wiley Online Library “dentistry” AND “domestic violence” AND “child” AND “oral health”856
“child abuse” AND “child neglect” AND “dentistry” AND “oral health”1280
Warsaw Medical University Library“dentistry” AND “domestic violence” AND “child” AND “oral health”495
“child abuse” AND “child neglect” AND “dentistry” AND “oral health”684
Inclusion criteria: original research, published after 2000 in English, Polish and Spanish language of children 0-18 years old assessing the methods of detection child abuse and neglect in the dental office-physical examination, interview with the parents/guardians, psychological examination and behaviour assessment.
Exclusion criteria: case reports, cross-sectional articles, literature reviews, books and books chapters, articles, guidelines, studies sampling exclusively undergraduate dentistry students; letters to the editor and/or editorials. All papers describing the situation of child abuse in the hospital environment (maxio-facial surgery department) were excluded.
The verification process is shown by the use of PRISMA flow diagram (fig. 1) (17).
Fig. 1. PRISMA flow diagram
*a study may be excluded for more than one reason
Results
Of 2721 potential studies screened, 52 studies were reviewed and 5 included (representing 1108 children). The full texts of the selected studies were revisited, and their data were extracted standardly. The information extracted and recorded from the studies were: the authorship; the year of publication; the country in which the study was developed; the sample size, age average, aim of the study. The characteristics of the qualified articles are presented in the table 2.
Tab. 2. Characteristics of the qualified articles
Author/yearCountryType of studyExamined groupYear averageType of violenceAim of the study
Montecchi et al. 2009 (18)ItalyCase control studyStudy group = 117
Control group = 120
10.5Neglect and physical abuseTo highlight dental neglect in a population of children with exposure to domestic violence or experience of abuse
Kvist et al. 2018 (19)SwedenResearch studyStudy group = 86
Control group = 172
8.9 ± 4.3Physical abuse, psychological abuse, intimate partner violence, sexual abuse, and neglectTo investigate the connection between hygiene negligence, caries, tooth injures, dental treatment avoidance and child abuse and neglect
Valencia-Rojas et al. 2008 (20)CanadaCase control studyStudy group = 66
Control group = general population
4.1Neglect, psychical and sexual abuse To investigate the prevalence of early childhood caries in a population of maltreated children
Nogami et al. 2017 (21)JapanResearch studyStudy group = 166
Control group = general population
(Survey of Dental Disease) (22)
11.6 ± 2.8Neglect, physical and sexual abuse, delinquency, truancyTo determine the prevalence of dental caries (dmft and DMFT) and its treatment level in children receiving temporary protection at a child guidance center (CGC)
Lourenço et al. 2013 (23)BrasilResearch studyFirst part of study: a total group of 149 children
Second part: study group = 16
control group = 14
5Dental and physical neglectTo analyze the relation between dental caries and neglect in five-year-old children
In selected articles different methods of research and obtaining information were used. They are presented in the table 3.
Tab. 3. Methods of research and obtaining information used in the selected articles
Author/yearMedical and socioeconomic interview/record-based analysisDental examination and observationAssessment of child’s behaviorDentist participating in the studyPsychologist participating in the study
Montecchi et al. 2009 (18)?????
Kvist et al. 2018 (19)?????
Valencia-Rojas et al. 2008 (20)?????
Nogami et al. 2017 (21)?????
Lourenço et al. 2013 (23)?????

Powyżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu, do którego możesz uzyskać pełny dostęp.
Mam kod dostępu
  • Aby uzyskać płatny dostęp do pełnej treści powyższego artykułu albo wszystkich artykułów (w zależności od wybranej opcji), należy wprowadzić kod.
  • Wprowadzając kod, akceptują Państwo treść Regulaminu oraz potwierdzają zapoznanie się z nim.
  • Aby kupić kod proszę skorzystać z jednej z poniższych opcji.

Opcja #1

29

Wybieram
  • dostęp do tego artykułu
  • dostęp na 7 dni

uzyskany kod musi być wprowadzony na stronie artykułu, do którego został wykupiony

Opcja #2

69

Wybieram
  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 30 dni
  • najpopularniejsza opcja

Opcja #3

129

Wybieram
  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 90 dni
  • oszczędzasz 78 zł
Piśmiennictwo
1. World Health Organization. 2006. Preventing child maltreatment: A guide to taking action and generating evidence. Online information available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2006/9241594365eng.pdf.
2. Jedlecka W: Formy i rodzaje przemocy. Przemoc w Prawie i Polityce 2017.
3. Helios J, Jedlecka W: Współczesne oblicza przemocy. Zagadnienia wybrane. E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wrocław 2017: 15-44.
4. Wissow LS: Child abuse and neglect. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1425-1431.
5. Harris JC, Balmer RC, Sidebotham PD: British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on dental neglect in children. Int J Paediatr Dent, Published Online: 14 May 2009.
6. Folland DS, Burke RE, Hinman AR, Schaffner W: Gonorrhea in pre-adolescent children: an inquiry into source of infection and mode of transmission. Pediatrics 1977; 60: 153-156.
7. Becker DB, Needleman HL, Kotelchuck M: Child abuse and dentistry: orofacial trauma and its recognition by dentists. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 97(1): 24-28.
8. Dubowitz H, Bennett S: Physical abuse and neglect of children. The Lancet 2007; 369(9576): 1891-1899.
9. Needleman HL: Orofacial trauma in child abuse: types, prevalence, management, and the dental profession’s involvement. Pediatr Dent 1986; 8(1): 71-80.
10. Kandagal VS, Shenai P, Chatra L et al.: Effect of stress on oral mucosa – review. Biol Biomed Rep 2012; 1: 13-16.
11. Washington TD: Psychological stress and anxiety in middle to late childhood and early adolescence: manifestations and management. J Pediatr Nurs 2009; 24(4): 302-313.
12. Soto-Araya M, Rojas-Alcayaga G, Esguep A: Association between psychological disorders and the presence of oral lichen planus, burning mouth syndrome and recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Med Oral 2004; 9: 1-7.
13. Kaufman AY: Aphthous stomatitis as a featuring syndrome of emotional stress in dental treatment. Q Int Dent Dig 1976; 7: 75-78.
14. Sircus W, Church R, Kelleher J: Recurrent aphthous ulceration of the mouth; a study of the natural history, aetiology and treatment. Q J Med 1957; 26: 235-249.
15. Suman S, Ankit S, Tulsi S: Effect of psycosomatic factors in oral diseases. Int J Clin Prev Dent 2014; 10(2): 51-54.
16. Maheshwari TN, Gnanasundaram N: Stress related oral diseases – a research study. Int J Phar Bio Sci 2010; 1: 1-10
17. PRISMA. Online information available at http://prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram.aspx.
18. Montecchi PP, Di TM, Sarzi AD et al.: The dentist’s role in recognizing childhood abuses: study on the dental health of children victims of abuse and witnesses to violence. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2009; 10: 185-187.
19. Kvist T, Annerbäck EM, Dahllöf G: Oral health in children investigated by Social services on suspicion of child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Negl 2018; 76: 515-523.
20. Valencia-Rojas N, Lawrence HP, Goodman D: Prevalence of early childhood caries in a population of children with history of maltreatment. J Public Health Dent 2008; 68: 94-101.
21. Nogami Y, Iwase Y, Kagoshima A et al.: Dental caries prevalence and treatment level of neglected children at two child guidance centers. Pediatr Dent J 2017; 27(3): 137-141.
22. Japanese Society for Oral Health Report on the Survey of Dental Diseases. Oral health association of Japan: Tokyo 2013.
23. Lourenço CB, de Lima Saintrain MV, Vieira APGF: Child, neglect and oral health. BMC Pediatr 2013; 13(1): 188.
24. Hessee SA: Physical manifestations of child abuse tooth head, face, and mouth. J Dent Child 1995; 62: 245-249.
25. Hallberg U, Camling E, Zickert I et al.: Dental appointment no-shows: why do some parents fail to take their children to the dentist? Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 18: 27-34.
26. Naidoo S: Profile of the oro-facial injuries in child physical abuse at a Children’s Hospital. Child Abuse Negl 2000; 24: 521-534.
27. Kepron C, Walker A, Milroy CM: Are there hallmarks of child abuse? II. Non-osseous injuries. Acad Forensic Pathol 2016; 6: 591-607.
28. Kvist T, Annerbäck EM, Sahlqvist L et al.: Association between adolescents’ self-perceived oral health and self-reported experiences of abuse. Eur J Oral Sci 2013; 121: 594-599.
29. Fägerstad A, Windahl J, Arnrup K: Understanding avoidance and non-attendance among adolescents in dental care – an integrative review. Community Dent Health 2016; 33(3): 195-207.
30. Douglas Von Kaenel BS, Casamassimo BPS, Wilson MS: Social factors associated with pediatric emergency department visits for caries-related dental pain. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23(1): 56-60.
31. Thomson WM, Spencer AJ, Gaughwin A: Testing a child dental neglect scale in South Australia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24(5): 351-356.
32. Ockell MN, Bågesund M: Reasons for extractions, and treatment preceding caries-related extractions in 3-8-year-old children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010; 11(3): 122-130.
33. Loochtan RM, Bross DC, Domoto PK: Dental neglect in children: definition, legal aspects, and challenges. Pediatr Dent 1986; 8(1): 113-116.
34. Blumberg ML, Kunken FR: The dentist’s involvement with child abuse. N Y State Dent J 1981; 47(2): 65-69.
35. Butts AC, Henderson LM: Navajo Indian dental neglect intervention program. J Tenn Dent Assoc 1990; 70(1): 42-45.
36. Elice CE, Fields HW: Failure to thrive review of the literature, case reports, and implications for dental treatment. Pediatr Dent 1990; 12(3): 185-189.
37. Fakhruddin KS, Lawrence HP, Kenny DJ, Locker D: Impact of treated and untreated dental injuries on the quality of life of Ontario school children. Dent Traumatol 2008; 24(3): 309-313.
38. Smitt HS, de Leeuw J, de Vries T: Association between severe dental caries and child abuse and neglect. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 75(11): 2304-2306.
39. Greene PE, Chisick MC, Aaron GR: A comparison of oral health status and need for dental care between abused/neglected children and nonabused/non-neglected children. Pediatr Dent 1994; 16: 41-45.
40. Greene PE, Chisick MC: Child abuse/neglect and the oral health of children’s primary dentition. Military Med 1995; 160: 290-293.
41. Keene EJ, Skelton R, Day PF et al.: The dental health of children subject to a child protection plan. Int J Paediatr Dent 2015; 25: 428-435.
42. Kivisto K, Alapulli H, Tupola S et al.: Dental health of young children prenatally exposed to buprenorphine. A concern of child neglect? Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2014; 15(3): 197-202.
43. Kvist T, Zedren-Sunemo J, Graca E, Dahllöf G: Is treatment under general anaesthesia associated with dental neglect and dental disability among caries active preschool children? Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2014; 15(5): 327-332.
44. Gustafsson A, Arnrup K, Broberg AG et al.: Psychosocial concomitants to dental fear and behaviour management problems. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17: 449-459.
45. Ministerstwo Zdrowia. Monitorowanie stanu zdrowia jamy ustnej populacji polskiej w latach 2013-2015. Wydawnictwo Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego, Warszawa 2016: 49-245.
46. Schwartz LL: Pain associated with the temporomandibular joint. J Am Dent Assoc 1955; 51: 394-397.
47. Laskin DM: Etiology of the pain dysfunction syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc 1969; 79: 147-153.
48. Carvalho TS, Lussi A, Jeaggi T, Gambon D: Erosive tooth wear in children, 2014. [In:] Erosive tooth wear. Vol. 25. Karger Publishers 2014: 262-278.
49. Cairns AM, Mok JY, Welbury RR: The dental practitioner and child protection in Scotland. Br Dent J 2005; 199: 517-520.
50. Harris JC, Elcock C, Sidebotham PD, Welbury RR: Safeguarding children in dentistry: 1. Child protection training, experience and practice of dental professionals with an interest in paediatric dentistry. Br Dent J 2009; 206(8): 409.
51. Harris JC, Elcock C, Sidebotham PD, Welbury RR: Safeguarding children in dentistry: 2. Do paediatric dentists neglect child dental neglect? Br Dent J 2009; 206(9): 465.
52. Welbury RR, MacAskill SG, Murphy JM et al.: General dental practitioners’ perception of their role within child protection: a qualitative study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2003; 4: 89-95.
53. Bsoul SA, Flint DJ, Dove SB et al.: Reporting of child abuse: a follow-up survey of Texas dentists. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25: 541-545.
54. Thomas JE, Straffon L, Inglehart MR: Knowledge and professional experiences concerning child abuse: an analysis of provider and student responses. Pediatr Dent 2006; 28: 438-444.
55. Manea S, Favero GA, Stellini E et al.: Dentists’ perceptions, attitudes, knowledge, and experience about child abuse and neglect in northeast Italy. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2007; 32: 19-25.
otrzymano: 2021-07-08
zaakceptowano do druku: 2021-07-29

Adres do korespondencji:
*Anna Pantelewicz
Zakład Stomatologii Dziecięcej Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny
ul. Binieckiego 6, 02-097 Warszawa
annapantelewicz@gmail.com

Nowa Stomatologia 3/2021
Strona internetowa czasopisma Nowa Stomatologia