Ponad 7000 publikacji medycznych!
Statystyki za 2021 rok:
odsłony: 8 805 378
Artykuły w Czytelni Medycznej o SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19

Poniżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu. Informacja nt. dostępu do pełnej treści artykułu
© Borgis - Nowa Medycyna 2/2024, s. 60-65 | DOI: 10.25121/NM.2024.31.2.60
*Nikodem Horst1, 2
Obstetric avulsion of the rectum from the anal canal and sphincter complex – time to update the Sultan Classification?
Śródporodowe odsznurowanie odbytnicy od kanału odbytu i kompleksu zwieraczy – czas na uaktualnienie skali Sultana?
1Department of General, Oncological and Colorectal Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences
2Gynaecological Obstetric Clinical Hospital, Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Streszczenie
Do oceny położniczych uszkodzeń krocza (OASIS) powszechnie stosowana jest skala według Sultana zaadaptowana przez WHO. Skala ta dotyczy obrażeń tkanek miękkich, kolejno: powierzchownych tkanek miękkich kanału rodnego (I), mięśni krocza (II), zwieraczy (III) oraz odbytnicy (IV). W aktualnym stanie wiedzy uszkodzenia śródporodowe krocza obejmują jednak struktury nieobjęte stopniami skali Sultana, m.in. uszkodzenia mięśni dźwigaczy odbytu oraz izolowane uszkodzenia odbytnicy (tzn. bez uszkodzenia zwieracza zewnętrznego [EAS] i zwieracza wewnętrznego [IAS]). Przedstawiany przypadek dotyczy właśnie izolowanego okrężnego oderwania (awulsji) odbytnicy od kanału odbytu od nienaruszonego kompleksu zwieraczy.
Summary
The Sultan Classification, which has been adapted by the World Health Organisation (WHO), is commonly used to assess obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). The tool assesses damage to: superficial soft tissues (I), perineal muscles (II), sphincters (III) and rectum (IV). However, according to current knowledge, perineal obstetric trauma may involve structures that have not been considered in the Sultan classification system, such as damage to the levator ani muscles and isolated damage to the rectum (i.e. without external anal sphincter [EAS] or internal anal sphincter [IAS] involvement). This paper presents a case of an isolated circular detachment (avulsion) of the rectum from the anal canal and from an intact sphincter complex.
Słowa kluczowe: awulsja odbytu, uszkodzenie śródporodowe krocza, skala Sultana, skala WHO uszkodzeń położniczych krocza, OASIS
Key words: anal avulsion, obstetric perineal injury, Sultan classification, WHO, obstetric anal sphincter injury, OASIS



Introduction
Severe obstetric perinatal injuries, i.e. with complete EAS tear (Sultan classification grade IIIb-IV), are a relatively rare complication of vaginal delivery. In total, Sultan grade III-IV perineal tears occur in approximately 0.6-7% of vaginal deliveries (1-3), but these statistics also include grades IIIa and b with incomplete EAS tears. Despite advances in medical knowledge, severe obstetric damage to the perineum is still an only partially curable consequence of giving birth. Patients often struggle with symptoms of perineal tear, such as gas and faecal incontinence, as well as sexual problems, throughout their lives.
The Sultan classification, which has been adapted by the WHO, is commonly used to assess obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) (4). This is a progressive assessment tool considering the observed mechanism of complete perineal tear, including anal tear: initially, the superficial soft tissues (I) are damaged, followed by the perineal muscles (II), EAS (IIIa, b), IAS (IIIc), and finally the anorectal wall (IV).
Other types of injuries, such as damage to the levator ani muscles and isolated injuries to the rectum without sphincter complex (EAS and IAS) involvement, may also occur during delivery (5).
This type of trauma is not currently included in the commonly used Sultan classification (WHO), and therefore not recorded in a systematic manner. This type of damage will be discussed in this case report, where a rare adverse event in the form of avulsion (detachment) of the rectum from the anal canal and the intact external and internal sphincters occurred during physiological delivery.
Case report
A 28-year-old primiparous woman with unremarkable general and obstetric history reported for her first delivery. She had a normal pelvic structure, with perineal height of approximately 3 cm. The first stage of labour lasted about 6 hours. The patient did not receive epidural anaesthesia. The delivery progressed physiologically in a cephalic longitudinal position. During the second stage of labor, the patient was allowed to change body positions, including the knee-elbow position. The child’s cardiac function assessed after each contraction was normal, without pathological decelerations. After approximately 1 hour and 40 minutes of the second stage of labor, at the third rotation of the head (extension), the midwife noticed the crowning and clear fluid discharge from the anus. A doctor was called and, on visual inspection of the perineum, he noted the presence of the head in the anus, distended during uterine contraction. Local anaesthesia was immediately administered and right medio-lateral episiotomy was performed, after which, during the first contraction, a fetus weighing 3,000 g was delivered without difficulty (Apgar score 10, 10). The infant was not wrapped in the umbilical cord; the position was occiput anterior, physiological; and the shoulders were delivered properly.

Powyżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu, do którego możesz uzyskać pełny dostęp.
Mam kod dostępu
  • Aby uzyskać płatny dostęp do pełnej treści powyższego artykułu albo wszystkich artykułów (w zależności od wybranej opcji), należy wprowadzić kod.
  • Wprowadzając kod, akceptują Państwo treść Regulaminu oraz potwierdzają zapoznanie się z nim.
  • Aby kupić kod proszę skorzystać z jednej z poniższych opcji.

Opcja #1

29

Wybieram
  • dostęp do tego artykułu
  • dostęp na 7 dni

uzyskany kod musi być wprowadzony na stronie artykułu, do którego został wykupiony

Opcja #2

69

Wybieram
  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 30 dni
  • najpopularniejsza opcja

Opcja #3

129

Wybieram
  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 90 dni
  • oszczędzasz 78 zł
Piśmiennictwo
1. Chia CC, Huang SC: Third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration in vaginal delivery. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 51(1): 148-152.
2. Gurol?Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L et al.: Third? and fourth?degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 120(12): 1516-1525.
3. Wilson AN, Homer CSE: Third? and fourth?degree tears: A review of the current evidence for prevention and management. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 60(2): 175-182.
4. Sultan AH: Editorial: Obstetrical Perineal Injury and Anal Incontinence. Clin Risk 1999; 5(6): 193-196.
5. Valsky DV, Cohen SM, Lipschuetz M et al.: Third? or Fourth?Degree Intrapartum Anal Sphincter Tears Are Associated With Levator Ani Avulsion in Primiparas. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35(4): 709-715.
6. Doxford-Hook EA, Slemeck E, Downey CL, Marsh FA: Management of levator ani avulsion: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308(5): 1399-1408.
7. Guedea MA, Zambrano JLA, Fons JB et al.: Alteration of anal sphincter function in patients with levator avulsion: observational study. Int Urogynecology J 2015; 26(7): 985-990.
8. Heliker BD, Kenton K, Leader-Cramer A et al.: Adding Insult to Injury: Levator Ani Avulsion in Women With Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2021; 27(7): 462-467.
9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins ? Obstetrics: Practice Bulletin No. 165: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128(1): e1-e15.
10. Austrian Urogynecology Working Group, Aigmueller T, Umek W et al.: Guidelines for the management of third and fourth degree perineal tears after vaginal birth from the Austrian Urogynecology Working Group. Int Urogynecology J 2013; 24(4): 553-558.
11. Seidenari A, Cuicchi D, Youssef A et al.: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: strategies for prevention, diagnosis, and management. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73(1).
12. Lua-Mailland LL, Wallace SL, Yao M, Propst K: Sexual Function in Women at 6 and 12 Months After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Is Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Associated With Improved Outcomes? Urogynecology 2023; 29(11): 880-889.
13. O’Shea MS, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Gossett DR: Long-Term Sexual Function After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2018; 24(2): 82-86.
14. Sayed Ahmed WA, Kishk EA, Farhan RI, Khamees RE: Female sexual function following different degrees of perineal tears. Int Urogynecology J 2017; 28(6): 917-921.
15. Schütze S, Hohlfeld B, Friedl TWP et al.: Fishing for (in)continence: long-term follow-up of women with OASIS ? still a taboo. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 303(4): 987-997.
16. Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW: Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 115(2): 234-238.
otrzymano: 2024-04-12
zaakceptowano do druku: 2024-05-05

Adres do korespondencji:
*Nikodem Horst
Katedra i Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Onkologicznej i Kolorektalnej, Uniwersytet im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
ul. Szwajcarska 3, 61-285 Poznań
nvh@ump.edu.pl

Nowa Medycyna 2/2024
Strona internetowa czasopisma Nowa Medycyna