Ponad 7000 publikacji medycznych!
Statystyki za 2021 rok:
odsłony: 8 805 378
Artykuły w Czytelni Medycznej o SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19

Poniżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu. Informacja nt. dostępu do pełnej treści artykułu
© Borgis - Nowa Medycyna 3/2024, s. 85-92 | DOI: 10.25121/NM.2024.31.3.85
*Natalia Dziewa1, Radosław Cylke1, Antonina Respondek-Bartuś1, Małgorzata Kołodziejczak1, 2
Proctological patient with von Willebrand’s disease as a surgical challenge – presentation of two cases
Pacjent proktologiczny z chorobą von Willebranda wyzwaniem dla chirurga – prezentacja dwóch przypadków
1Department of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw
2Warsaw Proctology Centre, St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Warsaw
Streszczenie
Choroba von Willebranda to najczęstsza wrodzona skaza krwotoczna (0,6-1,3% populacji). W szczególności pacjent proktologiczny z chorobą von Willebranda stanowi wyzwanie dla chirurga, gdyż zabieg przeprowadzany u tych pacjentów obarczony jest zwiększonym ryzykiem krwotoku. Celem pracy jest przedstawienie dwóch przypadków chorych proktologicznych ze współwystępującą chorobą von Willebranda oraz podsumowanie przeglądu literatury poświęconej postępowaniu okołooperacyjnemu u pacjentów obciążonych chorobą von Willebranda. Na podstawie przeglądu literatury można stwierdzić, że odpowiednie przygotowanie pacjenta do zabiegu operacyjnego zmniejsza ryzyko poważnego krwotoku bliskiego ryzyku ogólnopopulacyjnemu. Ryzyko krwawienia można zminimalizować poprzez staranną hemostazę w czasie zabiegu i terapię substytucyjną. Zarówno koncentraty czynników krzepnięcia FVIII/VWF, jak i desmopresyna (DDAVP) są skuteczne i bezpieczne w zapobieganiu krwawieniom podczas operacji lub zabiegów inwazyjnych u pacjentów z chorobą von Willebranda. Strategie leczenia różnią się w zależności od typu ciężkości choroby, rozległości zabiegu, nasilenia i charakteru krwawień występujących u danego pacjenta, a także stosowanego preparatu i czasu jego podawania. Wśród klinicystów brakuje jednoznacznej zgody co do ujednoliconych wytycznych postępowania z pacjentami z chorobą von Willebranda, którzy są poddawani zabiegom chirurgicznym.
Summary
Von Willebrand disease is the most common inherited bleeding disorder (0.6-1.3% of the general population). A proctological patient with von Willebrand disease poses a particular surgical challenge, as the procedures performed in these patients are associated with an increased risk of haemorrhage. The purpose of this paper was to present two cases of anorectal patients with co-existing von Willebrand’s disease, as well as to summarise the literature review on the perioperative management of such patients. Based on the literature review, it can be concluded that adequate preoperative care reduces the risk of major bleeding close to the one seen the general population. The risk of bleeding can be minimised by careful perioperative haemostasis and substitution treatment. Both FVIII/VWF clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) and desmopressin (DDAVP) are effective and safe in preventing bleeding during surgery or invasive procedures in patients with von Willebrand’s disease. Treatment strategies vary depending on disease severity, surgical extent, the intensity and nature of bleeding in a given patient, as well as the treatment used and the time of its administration. There is no clear consensus among clinicians on standardised guidelines for the management of patients with von Willebrand’s disease who are scheduled for surgical treatment.



Introduction
Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a haemorrhagic diathesis resulting from an abnormality of the Von Willebrand factor (VWF) found in plasma. It is characterised by an increased tendency to mucosal bleeding, caused by impaired platelet adhesion and decreased activity of plasma factor VIII (FVIII). Adequate VWF levels ensure the proper functioning of the above processes (1). The disorder is inherited in an autosomal dominant or recessive fashion. Both men and women may be affected. There are three types of the disease. Type 1 VWD is the most common and also the mildest subtype (accounting for 70-80% of patients with VWD). Type 2 is seen in about 20% of patients, whereas type 3 is rare, occurring in < 5% of cases (2). Recent guidelines strongly recommend that patients with a history of bleeding and VWF levels < 50 IU/dL be diagnosed for VWD (3).
Although mucocutaneous bleeding is the main symptom, patients may additionally experience gastrointestinal or joint bleeding. Symptoms and their severity vary depending on the type of VWD, VWF activity, age and gender (2). The aim of this paper was to present two cases of anorectal patients with co-existing VWD and to summarise and review current scientific data on the perioperative management of VWD patients.
Case 1
A 20-year-old woman with recurrent pilonidal cyst abscesses was scheduled for elective pilonidal cyst excision. The diagnosis was based on the characteristic clinical picture and confirmed by ultrasound examination. Transrectal ultrasound performed as part of the diagnosis ruled out perianal fistula. Initially, the patient presented with an elevated temperature, an abscess in the intergluteal cleft and local pain. The abscess perforated spontaneously. Empirical antibiotic therapy and topical treatment were started. However, the symptoms recurred in the months that followed and she underwent elective surgery one year after symptom onset. The patient had a coexisting history of type 1 VWD (VWF 29%, VWFAg 65%). She reported prolonged menstrual bleeding and bleeding after tooth extraction. Her VWD family history was negative. The patient had no history of major surgery. Due to her haematological status, the patient required appropriate perioperative management. She was consulted by an attending physician from an outpatient haematological clinic before the surgery. The consultation included recommendations for individually tailored perioperative management. Following the haematological recommendations, 1 x 2000 IU of intravenous VWF/FVIII concentrate was administered one hour before surgery. Subsequently, Bascom II procedure was performed for the pilonidal cyst. During the procedure, special attention was paid to thorough haemostasis, a Redon drain was placed in the wound and an additional pressure dressing was applied. The patient received intravenous VWF/FVIII concentrate at 1 x 2000 IU for two consecutive days; tranexamic acid 3 x 1 g and etamsylate 3 x 0.5 g were postoperatively started initially intravenously, then at home orally at the same dose, for a total of 7 days. The surgical drain was removed on the second postoperative day. No increased intra- or postoperative bleeding was observed compared to non-VWD patients. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of a pilonidal cyst excised with a healthy tissue margin. The patient was discharged home in good general and local condition on day 3 postoperatively. After 3 weeks, the patient developed surgical site infection associated with the formed hematoma. The wound was surgically debrided, a swab was taken, wound healing by granulation was continued, and empirical antibiotic therapy (amoxicillin with clavulanic acid) was included for 7 days. The patient admitted to non-compliance with the doctor’s recommendations on wound hygiene and infrequent wound disinfection. Again, no significant bleeding was observed, and the patient did not require VWF/FVIII concentrate. After discharge, the patient remained under the care of a surgical outpatient clinic at her place of residence. The wound healed 4 months postoperatively.
Case 2
The second patient was a 36-year-old woman with grade III bleeding haemorrhoids. Her first symptoms of haemorrhoidal disease in the form of bleeding and hypertrophied anodermal folds appeared during her first pregnancy. The diagnosis of type 1 VWD (VWF 30%, VWF:Ag 50%, FVIII 60%) was also made at that time. The patient developed postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal delivery. Prior to the pregnancy, no increased bleeding was observed. This patient also had no prior history of surgery. However, she had a family history of VWD. In years that followed, the haemorrhoidal disease progressed with recurrent bleeding. The patient was qualified for surgery. She required appropriate perioperative management and was also under the care of a haematology outpatient clinic. Intravenous VWF/FVIII concentrate at 1 x 2000 IU was administered one hour before the procedure. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy was performed. During the procedure, care was taken to ensure particularly thorough haemostasis, and the haemorrhoidal arteries were double-punctured. The patient received another dose of intravenous VWF/FVIII concentrate at 1 x 2000 IU only on the first day after the procedure. Tranexamic acid 3 x 1 g and etamsylate 3 x 0.5 g were started initially intravenously, then continued orally at home, at the same doses, for a total of 7 days, as in the previous patient. No bleeding occurred during treatment or follow-up. At the follow-up visit 8 weeks postoperatively, the anal canal was found to be healed, with no postoperative complications.
Discussion

Powyżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu, do którego możesz uzyskać pełny dostęp.
Mam kod dostępu
  • Aby uzyskać płatny dostęp do pełnej treści powyższego artykułu albo wszystkich artykułów (w zależności od wybranej opcji), należy wprowadzić kod.
  • Wprowadzając kod, akceptują Państwo treść Regulaminu oraz potwierdzają zapoznanie się z nim.
  • Aby kupić kod proszę skorzystać z jednej z poniższych opcji.

Opcja #1

29

Wybieram
  • dostęp do tego artykułu
  • dostęp na 7 dni

uzyskany kod musi być wprowadzony na stronie artykułu, do którego został wykupiony

Opcja #2

69

Wybieram
  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 30 dni
  • najpopularniejsza opcja

Opcja #3

129

Wybieram
  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 90 dni
  • oszczędzasz 78 zł
Piśmiennictwo
1. Connell NT, Flood VH, Brignardello-Petersen R et al.: ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the management of von Willebrand disease. Blood Adv 2021; 5(1): 301-325.
2. Laffan MA, Lester W, O’Donnell JS et al.: The diagnosis and management of von W illebrand disease: a U nited K ingdom H aemophilia C entre D octors O rganization guideline approved by the B ritish C ommittee for S tandards in H aematology. Br J Haematol 2014; 167(4): 453-465.
3. Weyand AC, Flood VH: Von Willebrand Disease. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America 2021; 35(6): 1085-1101.
4. Miesbach W: Perioperative management for patients with von Willebrand disease: Defining the optimal approach. Eur J Haematol 2020; 105(4): 365-377.
5. Nichols WL, Hultin MB, James AH et al.: von Willebrand disease (VWD): evidence?based diagnosis and management guidelines, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Expert Panel report (USA). Haemophilia 2008; 14(2): 171-232.
6. Laffan MA, Lester W, O’Donnell JS et al.: The diagnosis and management of von W illebrand disease: a U nited K ingdom H aemophilia C entre D octors O rganization guideline approved by the B ritish C ommittee for S tandards in H aematology. Br J Haematol 2014; 167(4): 453-465.
7. Zdziarska J, Chojnowski K, Klukowska A et al.: Management of von Willebrand disease. Recommendations of the Hemostasis Group of the Polish Society of Hematology and Transfusiology (2022). J Transfus Med 2022; 15(2): 75-99.
8. Brignardello-Petersen R, El Alayli A, Husainat N et al.: Surgical management of patients with von Willebrand disease: summary of 2 systematic reviews of the literature. Blood Adv 2022; 6(1): 121-128.
9. Chai-Adisaksopha C, Matino D, Iorio A: Perioperative Management of Von Willebrand Disease, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Blood 2016; 128(22): 1408-1408.
10. Rhoades R, French Z, Yang A et al.: Perioperative Outcomes of Patients with Bleeding Disorders Undergoing Major Surgery at an Academic Hemophilia Treatment Center. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2023; 29: 10760296231165056.
otrzymano: 2024-07-18
zaakceptowano do druku: 2024-08-08

Adres do korespondencji:
*Natalia Dziewa
Katedra i Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej i Transplantacyjnej Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny
ul. Nowogrodzka 59, 02-006 Warszawa
tel. 22 502 17 83
natalia.dziewa@gmail.com

Nowa Medycyna 3/2024
Strona internetowa czasopisma Nowa Medycyna