School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Department of Dermatology
Head of Department: prof. Ligia Brzezińska-Wcisło, MD, PhD
The process of skin carcinogenesis involves a series of transitional events, which can be initiated and promoted by many events such as exposure to physical or chemical carcinogens, chronic inflammation and viral infection. The primary factor contributing to the molecular pathogenesis of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) is unprotected skin exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. While UV-A (320-400 nm) induced photo-oxidative stress indirectly induces characteristic DNA mutations, the spectrum of UV-B (290-320 nm) irradiation directly results in the formation of cyclobutane (thymin) dimer formation in DNA and RNA (1). Many tumour suppressor genes and oncogenes have been studied and implicated in photocarcinogenesis, particularly p53, PTCH1, BRM and RAS (2). Persistent HPV infection is confirmed necessary factor for development of cervical cancer and anogenital neoplasia. The most common high-risk HPV types observed in anogenital intraepithelial neoplasia or anogenital cancer are HPV 16, 18 and 45 (3). Rates of anal HPV infection are extremely high in HIV-positive patients, particularly in men who have sex with men (MSM) (4). HPVs infect stratified epithelia and link productive replication with differentiation. The viral oncoproteins E6, E7 and E5 play a key role in the (pre)malignant transformation (5). Occupational skin cancers have particularly been due to industrial exposure to chemical carcinogens such as polycyclic hydrocarbons (e.g. from coal tar products) or to arsenic (6). Ionizing radiation such as X-rays can also cause skin cancer (5).
Actinic keratosis (AK) is the most common precancerous lesion of the epidermis. Clinically, they can vary from small erythematous scaly macules to pigmented rough patches in sun-exposed areas. The field cancerization can contain multiple clinically visible AKs, subclinical AKs (only visible under a microscope), and groups of keratinocytes with genetic mutations detectable only with molecular biology methods (7). AKs are characterized by keratinocytic atypia and considered carcinomas in situ. Three histologic grades of AK can be distinguished on the basis of degree of intraepidermal involvement of keratinocytic atypia: AK-I, in the lower third of the epidermis; AK-II, in the lower two-thirds of the epidermis; and AK-III, affecting the full thickness of the epidermis (8). Chronic exposure to ultraviolet radiation in fair-skinned patients is the most important risk factor for the development of AK. In the absence of appropriate repair mechanisms, these DNA changes represent the initiation of keratinocyte mutations which can progress into the development of AKs (9). Associated factors include advanced age, male sex, outdoor occupations (e.g., farming or seagoing occupations) and recreational activities (e.g., tennis, golf), place of residence (high altitude, latitudes closer to the equator), and exposure to artificial UV radiation (10). Skin phototype (I and II), chronic iatrogenic immunodeficiency (e.g., in organ transplant patients), genetic syndromes that undermine DNA repair mechanisms or chromosome stability, photosensitivity and exposure to certain toxins or drugs that affect the cell cycle (e.g., hydroxyurea or arsenic, and various biologic agents used in oncology are also probably implicated) (10). The relative risk of AK is 250-fold higher in transplanted patients than in immunocompetent individuals (11). Sunscreen has shown to be an effective AK prevention method reducing up to 24% AK lesions over time (12). Research also has shown the benefits of oral Nicotinamide use (500 mg daily or twice daily for 4 months) that caused 29-35% relative reduction in AK count (13). Products that combine sun screens with DNA reparative agents are currently being tested (14). Diagnosis of AK is mainly clinical. Hypertrophic or hyperkeratotic, pigmented, lichenoid and atrophic variants are recognized. Dermoscopy can help distinguish AK from superficial basal cell carcinoma, lentigo maligna or pigmented basal cell carcinoma. Confocal scanning laser microscopy and photodynamic diagnosis is currently used more for research than routine clinical care. AK lesions may regress spontaneously, remain AKs, or progress to invasive SCC (11). The risk of progression to invasive SCC over 10 years is between 6.1 and 10.2% and rises to 40% in immunodeficient patients (15). The progression to invasive disease should be suspected when a lesion appears inflamed, indurated, ulcerated or large (> 2 cm). Other signs of possible progression are bleeding, rapid growth, lack of response to appropriate treatment, or recurrence after successful treatment.
The choice of treatment should depend on patient profile, lesion characteristics, what options are locally available, and other constraints at the time of treatment. When lesions are few and isolated, treatment should target individual lesions. The most commonly used therapy for AK treatment is cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen. Side effects include blistering, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, scarring, and infection as well as discomfort during the freezing cycle. Targeting options of AK treatment include also electrodessication and curettage. Curettage harvests tissue for pathology, although it is impossible to confirm whether there is tumor invasion of the margins. Surgical removal of an AK is not routine and is undertaken only when there is suspicion of invasive SCC or lesions are recurrent (10, 15). In the management of multiple actinic keratoses, field therapies should be preferred to more destructive and/or invasive treatments, which allows treatment of both visible and subclinical lesions (16). Field therapies can be divided into patient-administered options such as topical therapies and physician-administered options such as photodynamic therapy (PDT), laser resurfacing, dermabrasion, and medium – to deep-depth chemical peels. Current approved topical therapies include 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 0.5-5% cream, imiquimod 5% and 3.75%, diclofenac sodium gel 3%, and ingenol 0.015% and 0.05% gel (17). All of the topical agents are associated with common side effects that include localized erythema, flaking, scaling, and crusting; however, dyspigmentation and scarring occur infrequently (18). It is noteworthy that the uniquely brief regimen for ingenol mebutate, 2 to 3 days, produced clearance rates similar to those with the other agents, which have treatment regimens of several weeks (18). Combining destructive treatments and topical ones may be advisable when there is progression to invasive SCC. Topical treatment with PDT and imiquimod may also be a beneficial combination (10). Oral systemic retinoids, dermabrasion, chemical peeling, and laser therapy are considered second-line or coadjuvant treatments and they should be considered for possible use in special circumstances (10).
1. Emanuele E, Spencer JM, Braun M: From DNA repair to proteome protection: new molecular insights for preventing non-melanoma skin cancers and skin aging. J Drugs Dermatol 2014 Mar; 13: 274-281.
2. Chen A, Halliday G, Damian D: Non-melanoma skin cancer: carcinogenesis and chemoprevention. Pathology 2013; 45: 331-341.
3. Suwalska A, Owczarek W, Fiedor P: Clinical usefulness of diagnostic methods for human papilloma virus dependent lesions. Pol Merkur Lekarski 2014; 36: 129-132.
4. Kutlubay Z, Engin B, Zara T, Tüzün Y: Anogenital malignancies and premalignancies: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 2013; 31: 362-373.
5. Mighty K, Laimins L: The role of human papillomaviruses in oncogenesis. Recent Results Cancer Res 2014; 193: 135-148.
6. Gawkrodger D: Occupational skin cancers. Occup Med (Lond) 2004; 54: 458-463.
7. Braakhuis B, Tabor M, Kummer JA et al.: A genetic explanation of Slaughter’s concept of field cancerization: Evidence and clinical implications. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 1727-1730.
8. Rowert-Huber J, Patel MJ, Forschner T et al.: Actinic keratosis is an early in situ squamous cell carcinoma: A proposal for reclassification. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156: 8-12.
9. Stockfleth E, Terhorst D, Braathen L et al.: Guideline on Actinic Keratoses, developed by the Guideline Subcommittee „Actinic Keratoses” of the European Dermatology Forum. 2011 [consultado 3 May 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.euroderm.org/images/stories/guidelines/guideline_Management_Actinic_Keratoses-update2011.pdf.
10. Ferrándiz C, Fonseca-Capdevila E, García-Diez A et al.: Spanish adaptation of the European guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of actinic keratosis. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2014; 105: 378-393.
11. Ismail F, Mitchell L, Casabonne D et al.: Specialist dermatology clinics for organ transplant recipients significantly improve compliance with photoprotection and levels of skin cancer awareness. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155: 916-925.
12. Darlington S, Williams G, Neale R et al.: A randomized controlled trial to assess sunscreen application and beta carotene supplementation in the prevention of solar keratoses. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139: 451-455.
13. Surjana D, Halliday G, Martin A et al.: Oral nicotinamide reduces actinic keratoses in phase II double-blinded randomized controlled trials. J Invest Dermatol 2012; 132: 1497-1500.
14. Emanuele E, Altabas V, Altabas K, Berardesca E: Topical application of preparations containing DNA repair enzymes prevents ultraviolet-induced telomere shortening and c-FOS proto-oncogene hyperexpression in human skin: an experimental pilot study. J Drugs Dermatol 2013; 12: 1017-1021.
15. Trakatelli M, Ulrich C, del Marmol V et al.: Epidemiology of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in Europe: Accurate and comparable data are needed for effective public health monitoring and interventions. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156: 1-7.
16. Micali G, Lacarrubba F, Nasca M et al.: Topical pharmacotherapy for skin cancer: part II. Clinical applications.J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 70: 979.
17. Uhlenhake E: Optimal treatment of actinic keratoses. Clin Interv Aging 2013; 8: 29-35.
18. Goldenberg G: Optimal treatment of actinic keratosis. Clin Interv Aging 2014; 9: 15-16.
19. de Santana Sarmento D, da Costa Miguel M, Queiroz L et al.: Actinic cheilitis: clinicopathologic profile and association with degree of dysplasia. Int J Dermatol 2014; 53: 466-472.
20. Ito T, Natsuga K, Tanimura S, Aoyagi S, Shimizu H: Dermoscopic Features of Plasma Cell Cheilitis and Actinic Cheilitis. Acta Derm Venereol 2014 Jan 28. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1795.
21. Fatani M, Hussain W, Baltow B, Alsharif S: Cutaneous horn arising from an area of discoid lupus erythematosus on the scalp. BMJ Case Rep 2014 Apr 3; 2014. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202322.
22. Kumar S, Bijalwan P, Saini S: Carcinoma buccal mucosa underlying a giant cutaneous horn: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol Med 2014; 2014: 518372. doi: 10.1155/2014/518372.
23. Zhou Y, Tang Y, Tang J et al.: Progression of penile cutaneous horn to squamous cell carcinoma: A case report. Oncol Lett 2014; 8: 1211-1213.
24. Nordstrom DK: Public health. Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. Science 2002; 296: 2143-2145.
25. Argos M, Kalra T, Pierce BL et al.: A prospective study of arsenic exposure from drinking water and incidence of skin lesions in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 174(2): 185-194.
26. Kile M, Hoffman E, Rodrigues EG et al.: A pathway-based analysis of urinary arsenic metabolites and skin lesions. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173: 778-786.
27. Hsu L, Chen G, Lee C et al.: Use of arsenic-induced palmoplantar hyperkeratosis and skin cancers to predict risk of subsequent internal malignancy. Am J Epidemiol 2013; 177: 202-212.
28. Ahsan H, Steinmaus C: Invited commentary: use of arsenical skin lesions to predict risk of internal cancer: implications for prevention and future research. Am J Epidemiol 2013; 177: 213-216.
29. Khandpur S, Malhotra A, Bhatia V et al.: Chronic arsenic toxicity from Ayurvedic medicines. Int J Dermatol 2008; 47: 618-621.
30. Voelter-Mahlknecht S, Scheriau R, Zwahr G et al.: Skin tumors among employees of a tar refinery: the current data and their implications. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2007; 80: 485-495.
31. Stern RS, Zierler S, Parrish J: Skin carcinoma in patients with psoriasis treated with topical tar and artificial ultraviolet radiation. Lancet 1980; 1: 732-735.
32. Roelofzen J, Aben K, Van de Kerkhof P et al.: Dermatological exposure to coal tar and bladder cancer risk: A case-control study. Urol Oncol 2014 Mar 11. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.12.006.
33. Kaplan R: Cancer complicating chronic ulcerative and scarifying mucocutaneous disorders. Adv Dermatol 1987; 2: 19-46.
34. Karagas M, McDonald J, Greenberg ER et al.: Risk of basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers after ionizing radiation therapy. For The Skin Cancer Prevention Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 1848-1853.
35. Lerche C, Philipsen P, Wulf H: X-rays and photocarcinogenesis in hairless mice. Arch Dermatol Res 2013; 305: 529-533.
36. Wolfe C, Green W, Hatfield H et al.: Multiple secondary cutaneous tumours following electron beam radiotherapy for cutaneous malignancies of the scalp. Australas J Dermatol 2012; 53: 233-238.
37. Morton C, Birnie A, Eedy D: British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen’s disease) 2014. Br J Dermatol 2014; 170: 245-260.
38. Cox N, Eedy D, Morton C: Guidelines for management of Bowen’s disease: 2006 update. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156: 11-21.
39. Hansen J, Drake A, Walling H: Bowen’s disease: a four-year retrospective review of epidemiology and treatment at a university center. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34: 878-883.
40. Westers-Attema A, van den Heijkant F, Lohman BG et al.: Bowen’s disease: A six-year retrospective study of treatment with emphasis on resection margins. Acta Derm Venereol 2014; 94: 431-435.
41. Burke M, Middleton TO: Mammary Paget disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2013; 113: 712.
42. Trebska-McGowan K, Terracina KP, Takabe K: Update on the surgical management of Paget’s disease. Gland Surg 2013 Aug 1; 2(3). doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2013.08.03.
43. Chen C, Sun L, Anderson B: Paget disease of the breast: changing patterns of incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment in the U.S. Cancer 2006; 107: 1448-1458.
44. Kanitakis J: Mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007; 21: 581-590.
45. Crignis G, Abreu L, Buçard A, Barcaui C: Polarized dermoscopy of mammary Paget disease. An Bras Dermatol 2013; 88: 290-292.
46. Miyamoto A, Akasaka K, Oikawa H et al.: Immunohistochemical study of HER2 and TUBB3 proteins in extramammary Paget disease. Am J Dermatopathol 2010; 32: 578-585.
47. Hikita T, Ohtsuki Y, Maeda T, Furihata M: Immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization studies on noninvasive and invasive extramammary Paget’s disease. Int J Surg Pathol 2012; 20: 441-448.
48. Kutlubay Z, Engin B, Zara T, Tüzün Y: Anogenital malignancies and premalignancies: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 2013; 31: 362-373.
49. Kobayashi H, Someda Y, Furukawa M et al.: Intralesional interferon in the treatment of extramammary Paget’s disease. Nihon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi 1987; 97: 1-7.
50. Cohen P, Schulze K, Tschen J et al.: Treatment of extramammary Paget disease with topical imiquimod cream: case report and literature review. South Med J 2006; 99: 396-402.
51. Yasar B, Yasar S, Gunes P: Extramammary Paget’s disease of the perianal region treated successfully with radiotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014 Oct 17 [Epub ahead of print].
52. Edey K, Allan E, Murdoch JB et al.: Interventions for the treatment of Paget’s disease of the vulva. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 10: CD009245.
53. Kim C, Kim Y, Cho M et al.: Perianal Paget’s Disease. Ann Coloproctol 2014; 30: 241-244.
54. Lee H, Shin D, Choi J, Kim K: A case of isolated bowenoid papulosis of the nipple. Ann Dermatol 2014; 26: 381-384.
55. Lim J, Lim K, Chong W: Dramatic Clearance of HIV-Associated Bowenoid Papulosis Using Combined OralAcitretin and Topical 5% Imiquimod. J Drugs Dermatol 2014; 13: 901-902.
56. Kutlubay Z, Engin B, Zara T, Tüzün Y: Anogenital malignancies and premalignancies: facts and controversies. Dermatol 2013; 31: 362-373.
57. Lèonard B, Kridelka F, Delbecque K et al.: A clinical and pathological overview of vulvar condyloma acuminatum, intraepithelial neoplasia, and squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 480573. doi: 10.1155/2014/480573.
58. Lillo F: Human papillomavirus infection and its role in the genesis of dysplastic and neoplastic lesions of the squamous epithelia. New Microbiol 2005; 28: 111-118.
59. Wilkinson E, Cox JT, Selim M, O’Connor DM: Evolution of Terminology for Human-Papillomavirus-Infection-Related Vulvar Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2014 May 14 [Epub ahead of print].
60. Tavassoli A, Devillee P: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs, IARC Press, Lyon, France 2003.
61. Kaushik S, Pepas L, Nordin A, et al.: Surgical interventions for high-grade vulval intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 3: CD007928. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007928.pub3.
62. Reyes M, Cooper K: An update on vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: terminology and a practical approach to diagnosis. J Clin Pathol 2014; 67: 290-294.
63. van Esch E, Dam M, Osse M et al.: Clinical characteristics associated with development of recurrence and progression in usual-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013; 23: 1476-1483.
64. Quddus MR, Sung CJ, Simon RA, Lawrence WD: Localized amyloidosis of the vulva with and without vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: report of a series. Hum Pathol 2014 Jul 23. pii: S0046-8177(14)00286-X. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.07.004.
65. Micali G, Nasca M, Innocenzi D, Schwartz R: Penile cancer.J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54: 369-391.
66. Kushnir C, Fleury A, Hill M et al.: The use of argon beam coagulation in treating vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia III: a retrospective review. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 131: 386-388.
67. Couto E, S?terdal I, Juvet L, Klemp M: HPV catch-up vaccination of young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 867.
68. Gormley R, Kovarik C: Human papillomavirus-related genital disease in the immunocompromised host: Part II. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66: 883.